A law

 What this has to do with --- hot and cold --- , well, I just don't know...

So, as an aside , I will just ask what does Microsoft and Disney have in common ?

A mouse.

Anyway, suppose, in some miraculous way, a law was passed in the U.S.A. that would make it illegal for either a Republican or a Democrat to serve in the government, at any level, --- state, federal, or local.

Imagine what would happen ?  Well, just speculating that both parties without consulting the other party would immediately change their name, because as we may know these " guys ", collectively, like to be first, out of the gate.  So, now you most likely would have a Democratic-Republican Party as well as a Republican-Democratic Party.  Since, they would not have consulted with each other, in advance, ( as would most likely be the case ), there will, most likely, be some confusion about who ends up with what name , but, we will assume, that some how, that will be --- sorted --- out.

Now, we, as --- John Q. Public --- are required somehow to figure out --- which party  we now belong to?   I mean suppose you are affiliated with Democratic; do you go with Republican-Democratic or Democratic-Republican ?  Really a tough choice,  and you could imagine ,now, how hard it would be to have  any " typical " discussion, as regards voting.   And , now, if you could use your imagination, to try and figure out how much it would cost ????  Individual voters now have to figure it out, as well as people who wish to serve in government positions, not to mention how much totally rebranding both parties would cost.  Of course, it would get, a lot easier if you go with red or blue.  This, all vaguely brings us back to , hot or cold ?

A bit, maybe, like --- operation red cabbage --- from the movie - I.Q.?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more