sTRICT Equality between Nonsense and Logic

 Just to prove that I can fool around with " Capitalizations ", please note --- sTRICT --

Of course when it comes to nonsense and logic one name must come to mind --- Lewis Carroll ---

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Carroll

Now, if you have examined previous posts , you will notice that I have mentioned the Alterians in relationship to the Altarians.  Of course, one notable aspect of the Altarians would be their persistent pursuit of --- Justice --- .  .  Now, some might think I have some bias or prejudice in my distinction between these two groupings or categories of civilization or cultures.  This perceived bias in my observations regarding these somewhat distinct categories, would be mostly in that I discussed   Altarians first, and I did not want to confuse anyone with the Alterians.  

See, one distinguishing feature , is that the Alterians tend to " feel " or " believe ", that there is some kind of balance in " Nature " or " Reality ", between nonsense and logic, because, how do we distinguish true nonsense from actual " logic " ?   So, while the Alterians are muddling over this issue, the Altarians have busied themselves with with , I don't know how to describe it , but kind of chasing after Justice.   It's kind of a subtle distinction in perspectives that sometimes develops between groups that are either separated by enormous distances or just have quite distinctive language groups, and hence tend to communicate in distinctive ways.

So, at the end of the day, I'll just say, ( " when is the (end) " ?), to the best of my knowledge these guys have never engaged in what folks from around here would call a " shooting " war, but they will occasionally trade some " biting " slurs from time to time.   Lots of slurs, sometimes kind of hot, or maybe cold, depending on your particular POV.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more