For better /or for worse

 Now, I think culturally, and in many cultures these words stand out a bit, on account of they reflect something about relationships.  So, if we think about relationships, it is highly fundamental to the concerns of arithmetic, geometry, or mathematics in a broader way, because nothing much happens in the sense of some kind of transition without 2 players.  One of the more important notions of course is that after these transitions you end up with an equality.  When you think about it , although children practice this on an almost daily basis, the notion of equality, is fundamentally , pretty rare, in nature or the natural world.  

But reflecting on the better or worse part, what you do find in nature or real life is these better and worse, or better, or worse, tend to combine in really odd, and ,you might say, inappropriate ways.  Of course, if you did say inappropriate, sometimes the game changes drastically, on account of inappropriate is sometimes a strong signal that, in fact you are really talking about --- impossible --- (*)

Now, comes along, the very strong currents of -- Star Trek ---, and a singular line, from a singular character ,; something to the effect that ---- NOTHING ---, is impossible.  I am not sure where his premise came from, for that conclusion, but everybody would listen to that particular character, because he embodied, what appeared to be, or at least was indicated to be --- pristine -- logic.  

So, this brings us back to another, fairly simple issue of, what does pristine mean, and what the heck is appropriate ?  That only leaves us with, better or worse, better and worse, or maybe, hot and cold ?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more