Imaginary Risk!

 Now, to begin Imaginary risk!, you must first exit the reality in which there is no Imaginary Risk!, and then enter a reality, (probably by  moving to your left ), in which Imaginary Risk! does in fact exist.  Kind of like the Twilight Zone.  

Well, first thing is there must be some rules.  The most important would be that the player actually has to be at the board.   In other words, if the player is not at the board , like goes and gets a sandwich, he is out. 

Now, the nice things about Imaginary Risk! , is you have a board that kind have a variety of sizes which will allow it then to have a very large and varied number of players.  So , for example, you can have 40 or even more players at the beginning of the game.  Other than that, it's really like regular risk, in that you take turns, like clockwise or anti-clockwise, and then you can attack other players, but there are more and different cards, and you got all kind of things like balloons, and airplanes, and ect., etc., ( maybe " space ", lasers ? ) 

Anyway, get a group of  - friends - together, and you really want everyone to be - friends - at the end.  The natural progression will be that players drop out and you end up with just a few at the end.  Somewhat like regular Risk!, you can find yourself in a situation where the game just goes on and on, and suppose now, after a good deal of time you have 3 or 4, and you all really want to have some winner, but suddenly it might occur to you all, that maybe it would be just easier to declare everybody else the winners, because, it's just easier, and you are all tired, and nobody else can say anything , because they are all out.

So, just in case you do enter some reality, in which Imaginary Risk! is actually available, and where people actually do play, you might have some idea of what you would be up against.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more