General Staff Meeting

So , if we imagine, throughout history - whatever that may mean, there must have been at least one General B.S., we should be able to imagine, so I am going to call B.S. ---> Bulldog Sherman, after Sherman from Rocky and Bullwinkle.  So at some point we might imagine a staff meeting as follows.

General B.S. : Now, men and ladies, it has become quite clear to me, that there has been a lessening of focus on, general b.s., and the troops generally have become significantly more focused on " specific " , b.s.  Now, of course, I do see this as somewhat of a problem, to the effectiveness of our being able to actually achieve our real mission and goals, so to speak.  Now, we need some ideas here so we can really make  " serious " progress, as they say, in a more ----> forwardly direction, because I, as your leader  really want us all to be going, more or less, in mostly, the same, general direction.

Staff ( something, somedofy ) :  K, we see your angle here.  We see that " thought " process, and I believe that in general we as your staff, do believe in such a thing as a " forwardly " direction.  And for our part, we have in fact attempted to instill this sense of a " forwardly " direction.  However, it is also clear to us that most of the men and the ladies, have become much more focused around specific b.s. as opposed to the general b.s., and frankly, none of us, so far have been able to alter these developments.  Our best approach , so far, has been to encourage , small groups, to focus more on general b.s., so that general b.s. does not entirely die out among the troops.

General B.S. : men and ladies, it is now clear to me that there is only one course of action left to me at this time >>>> politics.  I will resign my commission, and with my life savings, I will enter the public sphere so to try and encourage more general b.s. from the population at large.  And therefore, I now appoint General Something SomeDofy, right here and right now , to take over for me, and lead our troops as best as he may, even though >>> specifically >>>> I have no authority to do so.  How about an amen ??? 

 >>> probably not real ? <<<<  There was a Major Major Major, but that is entirely a different story.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more