More or less, goesintas ...

 When you have many , < protagonists > , and of course the corresponding < antagonists >, running around in many seemingly , meaningless ways, why  you want to take a ,,, digression ,,, , into the bowels, as you might say, of goesintas or goes into s ,  as others might say.

Of course, facing the goes into s, can be a daily, or perhaps an hourly concern , which is for example, our good friend and pal,  called MPG, or miles/per gallon.  And we, of course have a number for that.  But consider the dilemma  faced when preparing macaroni and cheese, with suddenly many, many goes into s now become involved.  Another interesting number 1.25 * 10 **(-9) , which I believe is the number of goesintas, as concerns number of people on Earth.  I am not entirely sure if that number is in fact correct, but pretty close.

So , briefly, you will note, generally that the physics guys/gals, well , they have been into this goesintas for so long now, that they have piled them up quite impressively, but now have better equipment, so to be sure, they will continue to pile them up, And once they do find a >>>> good <<<<< one, they will rarely ever , try to get rid of it.  In this way, they have this in common with mathematicians, who may be even worse, I am sure at this point they may have some concerns about how much " access ", they will actually get, to this fancy, new ,,, equipment.  Who knows, however, mathematicians are obviously kind of distinctive.  

And then you have the chemists who seem to be equally concerned with goesintas as goesoutas.

You know , with 1,25 * 10 ** (-9) earth/person, well, it has got to be pretty interesting ??? Easy to get confused, and on top of that, harder and harder to avoid. ???



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more