Now, about principals ?

 All I can say about principals is : if you don't have any, that might be a problem.  If you do have principals, and you have more than one, like say several, then try and get them in a bunch.

Now, it's important to skip past the 1990s, not because nothing happened, but as far as democracy is concerned, in relationship to Ralphy , then you just have to consider that it was not until the " early " 2000s that his crankiness increased and that neurosis began to , sort of , sink in.

Well, for the Altarians that were monitoring all this, obviously, the neurosis was an issue, but nobody really knew what to do about it, so although some were concerned, they just let it go.

But the issue is, what was his perspective in the early 2000s.  Well, both he and Dr. Z, continued to believe that democracy did still mean something.  But looking at the bigger picture at that time, it was kind of like, as they say, the debri hit some fan, all all of a sudden, well, it just seemed to get messy.  What many assumed to be " up ", did not seem all that " up ", and therefore, the " up " was easily confused around that time with the down.  

And so, gradually, we arrive at the present, at which time more debri seems to have hit one or more fans, and hence sorting stuff out seems to have gotten much more difficult, or any way, more difficult than it may have seemed in the past.  

But as they say, that was then, and now is now, briefly.  I ask myself, and I am sure Dr. Z. might ask himself, if Ralphy even gives a damn about all that stuff, at this point ?

Well, if he does, we won't know about that until part III.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more