Something about nothing, or nothing about something ?

 You could also call it, >> all in it's good time <<, or, briefly on the nature of time.

But before any of that , Mr. Z, is the man behind the curtain, who is the employer of Susan, Maggie's older sister, who has been employed by Mr. Z, for quite some time and of course they are both licensed professionals.  We have to call Mr. Z, Mr. Z, because he knows, probably too much about Ralphy. How he acquired all that information is not entirely clear.  Could be relatives in Missouri ?

And so this is supposed to get into a pointless ramble about time and numbers and things like that, but most everything I write is kind of like that, so might be redundant. We can remain hopeful that part III is not a >>> stupid <<< remake of the African Queen, but traveling through " space ", because that would be kind of >>> stupid <<<.  Also, the key thing is that Maggie has to do something before we get to part III, and also the tin man, the tiger, and Mr. Z, must all meet up with Maggie, in order to do, which she must do.  ????  I pretty much know where, but that is the point at which everything gets confusing.

And all I can say about Ruby Slippers is, well, I hope there is a pair in Grand Rapids.  It's so hard to know for sure.

Also, I could sum everything up right now, but, it is not clear to me if there is going to be a part IV, or a part V, because everything depends on what is going to " actually " happen , in part III. 

In other words, it's all about numbers, basically.  Principally the point is , what Ralphy really thinks about democracy or Democracy, which both words are pronounced the same, even if they do have entirely different meanings, in some ways, quite like , why are there 10 commandments or Commandments ???  So, what does that all mean ?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more