At this point ....

 So, un doubtedly, uhm, this issue of " points " is extremely difficult, on account of everybody assumes they ( currently ) know, what the point is , well, does anyone ever get to the point.  Maybe , sometimes.  

Anyway, as " points " apply to the issue , presently confronting Skylander, Marigold, Ralphie, and Bloomer, it breaks down like this:

Bloomer knows somelthing: He knows where all the tools are. And actually has figure out which manuals go with which equipment, which IMHO, is both remarkable, and truly a genuine achievement of earth like, what you call it. Hominids ?????

Skylander: Has been " paddling " sometimes upstream, sometimes downstream, has trouble landing her " vessel " on a " planetary " surface, and gets lost a good deal, but was able to get to the Earth's moon, which apparently does not really have a name, but is simply called Earth's moon, but they did name Monday's after " it ".   

Marigold:  Pretty enigmatic at this point.  Perhaps, responsible for the , what you call it, titering, high pitched and rythmic ????  Possible ... open question.

Well, Ralphie:  1954 Studebaker Pick-up Truck, ( exactly , what do you expect from a pick-up truck ?? ).  He really did not get Dr. Einstein, except he did like that fiddle playing, and was actually able to " harmonize ", with that " old " guy.  Pretty old,  then, during the mid-fifties;  did think he was pretty thoughtful with his response concerning connections with the State of Isreal.  Generally , a thoughful gentleman, but he also had some really good tone from that instrument, actually ... No kidding ... Some reliable folks will agree to that ... Possibly , ah, German ????

So, what exactly is my point ?  Well, it's like, these folks are in a big fix, right now, and how they are going to get un-fixed from this fix , is at this point, anyones guess.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more