Dangling carrots, part IV

 So, before getting back to a story, that right now, I am hoping remains the same, we have to talk about dangling carrots.  Specifically, a Nobel Prize winning chemist, in L.A. who , for all his carrots , felt he was just not appreicated.  My guess, is that sometimes, even if you get a carrot or two, it might not be enough.

How does this relate to Ralphy and his buddies ?  Well, with only about 50,000 light years to go, they are in for some pretty smooth sailing.  And the big issue, of course, is the course, which means, which way are you going.  Well, Ralphy knows exactly where he is going, and although they obviously would need to make a few stops, simply because being cramped up in what ever you call it for so long, you just have to take some breaks and of course they did that.

Bloomer  remained curious about the " speed-o-metter ", as to whether or not it was properly connected or not, and in fact what those reading actually mean.  Skylander, just simply didn't care.  She was always pretty sure she was " somewhere ", and the details of " where ", or how quickly she might get from " here " to " there ", was not all that important for her.  Probably an typical Altarian behavior, but maybe she was just " different " in that way. Merrigold really had few issues, as far as the notion of " speed " is concerned, possibly because, Skylander did infact assemble Merrigolds " guts " so, they often were of " one " mind about these kinds of things.

At the end of the day, we can be pretty sure  that Ralphy will in fact arrive at his destination, because, there is pretty much nothing that can stop that, except some weird invasion force , from some galaxy, most likely from " far, far, away ". You know , them , guys.

But assuming nothing like that happens, well, probably every thing will be okay, because why ? Because Ralphy will arrive at his " home " world, or region or where ever it may be that he does originate from.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more