How to cook salmon, sometimes.

 While adding " sometimes " , this may have nothing to do with salmon.

Basically, it's a digression about the " operational " aspects of the x-Conferate, currently c-Alliance, and the seperate but, at times conneted, " info gathering " aspect as relates to their , you know, techy guys with weapons and other bizarre equipment.

In other words, for about 20,000 years you have a situation going on where the communication between two seperate star systems is sometimes better and sometimes worse.  So, at this " particular " time it is nice to know, it's about 50/50.  But you can be sure the operationa guys knew and to this point know nothing about Studebaker's in space ... Nothing.

And how this relates is the concept of " projection " of holograms, which oddly, Deep Pockets, really did not know what exactly was going on with Ralphy as regards to his holographic ability, or in fact that he did have a lot of that.  Some of course they know, at some level. Now, on the operational level , knowledge of this technology is a bit vague, or somewhat vague at any rate. 

Basically , imagine you are monitoring Ralphie in say L.A. in traffic stalled.  Now you got about 12 hrs or maybe more of vary bizarre info, usually a lot of noise and confusion.  Now, throw in that this would happen in cities all over the globe , like Rio, Rome, Cinncinati, Lisbon, Cairo, Mexico City, Tokyo, Bejing, well that's a lot of " noise " to sift through.

But before we get back into the post worm hole postion in the galaxy, it is kind of important to know that, Capt. Major , looks suprising like an Altarian version of Marlon Brando, and even ; I know, hard to believe, even has a son people call Superman.  Totally " unbelieveable " stuff, right here in the 'ol Milky Way... 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more