I believe ... ???

 Number one thing I believe is that whatever I believe , I want it to be happy.  Why believe somethings that will make you " feel " bad.  Seems in many ways , that the effort to believe , what ever it may be, is kind of pointless, if it makes you " feel " bad, out of the gate.

Number two, I believe, somewhere , there is " more " Bogart , dialogue in me.  Maybe not, but I'd like to think , that on , some distant planet, which " hopefully " , has not " exploded ", a hologram of Humphrey Bogart is, " okay " .

Number three, and I haven't done any research, but to the best of my knowledge , neurology has not yet been able to discover what makes a " Democrat/democrat " , one of those, and what makes a " Republican/republican ", here in the U.S.A. , one of those, and yet there does seem to be differences , that you you might be able to describe as physiological.  You would think they could build MRI machines with a light , that would reveal that difference, as likely you'd want to distribute your patience to opposite sides of your " facility ", so that the " Republican/republicans ", would always be on your " right "  of that facility, and likewise , all the " Democrat/democrats ", would then be on the " left " side of the facility, in which all those signs could be different " colors "; well, one color for one side and one color for the other, 

Now, you can clearly see, how this would make " patient " care, so much easier.  ???? 

So, at long last we come to this remarkable conclusion.  Politics is not the problem, that we have in this country.  It's bioengineering.  If we only had better , MRI, in are care facilities, all these " political " issue would " fade " away ... The problem of course might also be that " neurology ", is in fact not able to detect those " differences ",  even with all the " evidence " that is now available for that.

My point is that this is all the neurologists fault.  And to think, my Dad, might have been a neurologist himself, if he hadn't " punched " somebody ....  ?????

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more