And so, We the People, ...

 So, we are living in a very unusual country that is founded about , this very weird notion of We The People,  as follows:

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA—1787 1 WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. 

So then, We The People, are now defined by, actions, which are

1) forming, 2) establishing 3) insuring 4) providing 5) promoting 6) and securing ,,,

that defines who, this -->  We The People, might, in fact be.

So we know what we want to form: more perfect Union ... so go from a " less " perfect one, and figure out how to get to a " more " perfect one. That is step one.

Now, you got to establish Justice and I would say try and insure some domestic Tranquility while you are establishing some Justice. Now, we are half way there.

So to complete this task of actually becoming We The People, all you need to do is provide a common defense, promote general Welfare, and secure Blessings of Liberty.

Now, how hard can that " really " be?  Seems like after doing this for 240 years, it has suddenly become, impossible or un - achievable.  

I believe, the trick, the secret sauce involved with all this , is quite simply , we have to allow ourselves, and give ourselves the permission to  form and establish and insure and provide and promote and secure.  We do know, we have been doing it for some time now, so we should be able to continue in some way to do it.  It might seems very hard, especially, maybe, right now, but if we allow ourselves and have some confidence in ourselves, then maybe we can continue, just to try, a little bit. That try a little bit even has a name. It's called courage. 

And that will make us , We The People, as we are. If necessary, perhaps, we can use a mirror.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more