Opinions .... ????

 And so, when confronted by , " what do I know for sure ? ", that answer would be, generally: " not that much ".  That would pretty much be true, almost all the time.

Nevertheless, in maybe less than 90 days, we will be making a choice between A and B, or preferably #1 and #2.  Of course, we might have an issue if Pluto smacks Mars, in the back of the head, that might change the " stellar " dynamics.

And starting with #1.  Now, it appears that over time this individual has demonstrated over and over again that this #1, has a load of principals, and speaks from those principals and appears to act in co-ordination with those principals.  This is a big deal, in my opinion.  I know something about this because my mother was also, an individual who, generally, or seems like almost always, acted based on many principals, and many of which proved effective for most of her life.

Now, as to individual #2, that individual appears do have a significant deficit in that area.  He seems to have few or no principals, and if he does have them, well, likely his actions and his words do not tend to support any really congruential or maybe valuable principals. In fact, he might argue that having principals , is a weakness.

So choosing between #1 and #2, I guess I would highly tend be be supportive, as much as possible, with #1, because I know, that kind of behavior tends to work better, in most situations.  It tends to be a signifier of  successful completions of various endeavors, ahead. 

And to the point, like it our not, there must be many significant endeavors which must be brought to significant completions, for everybody's sake.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more