Something about 2024 elections.

 Well, number one we can all be glad, it was not Dr. Who, that won the Presidential election, primarily because he is so often prone to flying away in a police box, and can reappear in the past, which is quite upsetting kind of behavior, so we definitely have that to be grateful for.  But, I did do some work on the election which is contained in the following blog:

https://idn-ai.blogspot.com/

But, in many ways it was a great event, and of course a quite " pricey " event, s0 Elon Must probably spent less than $200,000,000.00 on that, so I'm going with " pretty " pricey. 

All that said, in many ways I kind of realized some of my , maybe, so called, ambitions, as there was a good deal of " partying together ", in that many so-called democrats and many so-called republicans did party together, but now we have reached such a point as to only be able to describe democrats as the party that got the most mud in it's face.  Now, that may be a good thing , or it may be a bad thing, however, what comes to my mind really at this point is, >> was it a fair coin toss << ?

Obviously this has been a focus of some thought for some time, and of course the " fair coin toss ", is quite a big deal in American sport. But ideally with the toss there are rules, then there is the flip and the catch and the result.  Also , important to note, you really need three people to make this work, two opponents and one coin person.

So we definitely had opponents , but the third person becomes kind of vague, and how you rationalize or view the third person kind of determines how well you can analyze the " fairness " of the toss.  Now for some the fairness is not what " really " mattes, what matters is , that  generally the difference is within about 2%  , known as the " margin of error ", which effectively means, " we don't really know ".  The the election itself resolves that " error ".

An analysis , clearly involves some kind of Mandelbrot set, at least it looks that way to me, but what in fact are we really talking about ?  Are we just winding are way into infinity or do we have any idea what we are " actually " doing?  That is also a tough question, and as they say, time will tell and time does make fools of us all.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more