What did the American people " actually " choose ?

 Well, actually choose ?  Was there a genuine choice ?  Or was it mostly emotions, and narratives and stories, many of them possibly not true ? Well, one thing is for sure, it was well documented, and given the opportunity for study, will undoubtedly be a hot topic for some time.  However, the result that may seem quite abstract , may not be that difficult to untangle. 

So, if we break the electorate in three groups, capital, management, and labor , capital went with Trump, and apparently large parts of management and labor also went with Trump, and likely that group had it's own reasons and justifications. 

At the end of the day, that may or may not make sense, but that appears to be what happened. And so you might think that, the party principally developed to fight slavery prevailed, and I would assume because, they are trying to fight slavery?  

I like to look at democracy based on the Greek model which is the demos, who lives outside of the city where integrated into the city.  Not sure what they called the people who lived in the city.

That may or may not make any sense, but you know there are an awful lot of things, we experience on a regular basis, that don't necessarily make any sense.

One thing is pretty clear. If all the Democrats join the Republican party, will the Republicans continue to be Republicans , or , will the Republicans then leave the Republican party for the Democrat party, which seems unlikely, or will they start a different party, with some other name ? Then you have questions like, if all the Democrats , except a few, become Republicans will that raise or lower the average I.Q. in the Republican party, or will it just average all out ?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more