Conflict detectors and Niel Bohr

 So, I have to start with conflict, which as you may or may not know, occur regularly throughout what some might describe as, happens all over the place, in our daily lives. Be that as it may, certain category, or classifications of these " conflicts " probably fill spaces, much like , Dr. Bohr's " atom " fills our lives, in some space called Hilbert.

Now, oddly enough , just before this, Dr. Einstein had kind of proceeded to shock the scientific community by proving that the "little " things, everyone assumed made up every thing else where not in fact those things , but something probably bigger, it was probably opportune for Neil Bohr, to come up with these things, but one step better, a process to detect, and classify them. So, everyone seemed to think that was " super " , congratulations all around, and of course they developed , processes and techniques , to more or less expand on all of that. You do know all this went on in a relatively small area, and did of course include one woman , Emmy Noether, who was prominent among them, and probably did more " work " than the rest of them combined. Who knows, just an opinion. 

At the end of the day, Neil Bohr's atom was all about this particular conflict between that " tiny " electron, and it's " heavy " oppositional proton. So, the big deal is these two things, rather oddly can't cross paths, unless they do, which they do, but never mind that.  The Swedes did in fact seem pretty happy about the whole idea, generally.

And sure, these definitely are and where great ideas. Definitely had profound effects on academia, and the printing business , actually a lot of stuff, for example, light bulbs.

I guess my point is " many ", "many " of these conflicts and spaces, kind of resolve themselves, in this place called , whatever you want to call it ?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more