Okay now, fighting and working

 So , obviously these terms might be somewhat difficult to dis-entangle, but spending a good deal of time on entanglement, while difficult to dis-entangle, it's hard, but not impossible.

Okay, one problem you must acknowledge, many people do make a living fighting, so in that situation, dis0entangling may not be impossible, but, I think it may be fair to look at this in a much broader context.

So we have " fighting for democracy " and "working for democracy ", " fighting against bureaucracy " "  or " working for reform, restructuring, efficiency, and security " , " fighting for right " , and " working for sustainable societies and community "  , and this could go on , but objectively  sometimes these distinctions are more of a point of view , issue.  

But on some plain, whether you call it labor, work, or fighting, what we are talking about, is tangible efforts, that have tangible or meaningful  results, and in this context of meaningful, I mean , better state of mind, body or well being, for somebody or something.

But at the end of the day , the concern about fighting, is , " who are you fighting ? " . Are you fighting against yourself, or for yourself, for your family or against your family, for your neighbor, or against your neighbor, for you community or against you community, for your region or against your region,  For your nation or against your nation , for this planet, or against this planet, and finally for humanity or against humanity >

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Synchronicity

 So, this strange, word, which suggests something like, two things happening at the same time, which are seemingly disconnected.  So, that may appear first mostly in the works of Carl Jung, and the formulations of many of his concepts related to applications of phycology.   Now, to the best of my understanding, Irwin Schrodinger, in the late 40's and early 50's kind of latched onto this " concept ", in relation to describing the " kind of " physics, connected to biologicals processes.  So maybe this is funny or not, but during this same time Schrodinger was supposed to be working with Einstein on the >>> Unified Field Theorem <<< , I guess, the " Theorem " gives it all away.  At some point , Schrodinger may have given a >>> press conference <<<  in which he announced that " they ", had been successful.  Well, he had not previously consulted Einstein, and apparently Einstein response was, okay we are don...
Read more

Perplexity, absurdity, and power

 So, when you consider or imagine " absolute " power, you must also consider the issue of " infinite " work.  In other words, without the results or effects of power, you really don't know anything about it. Nevertheless, throughout most of human history, we have labored under this concept of " absolute " power, which in and of itself produces very difficult logical or mental conundrums.  Of course, Dr. Einstein was fairly successful in dispelling some of these odd conundrums in particularly as regards some of our notions related to the physical world and our " environment " so to speak, however, that required a life time of work, and the help of many colleagues over the years. But simply, even if you do consider the >>>> universe <<<<< to be an infinite amount of work and therefore requiring an infinite/absolute amount of power, well, if you're going to try and rustle up numbers that actually make sense, you ar...
Read more

Something, something, reality

 Now, when we reflect back on " reality ", most people will agree, >>> it's hard to do without it <<< Now, we might be able to figure out how Godel's Proof , ties back to all this stuff, but it seems to me that if you want to describe some kind of reality, then you pretty much have to talk about diversity, and so probably, possibly what you are really talking about is the " ability " to sort out, elements of diversity as being a substantive process which it kind of seems like is persistently .occurring.   This might occur through action like --->  back actions <--- of some different processes or  even ---> front action <----, which might be easier to comprehend. So , if you are an automobile, and you can travel to pretty much anyplace in the world within 1 hour, then, things might look a bit different, particularly if you are into variation and transformation.  So, for example, Ralphy will rarely go to Africa, unless, it's l...
Read more